With the global population continuing to grow and men’s options for contraception still limited to condoms and vasectomy, the time is ripe for another contraception revolution¹. Access to and use of contraceptives can meaningfully reduce unintended pregnancy rates in both developed and developing countries and contexts². Empowering people to determine their family planning outcomes (i.e., number of children) has far-reaching impacts, including: eliminating health disparities³, helping people achieve educational goals⁴, reducing poverty⁵, decreasing gender inequalities⁶, developing more sustainable production and consumption patterns⁷, and more. In fact, improvements to family planning programs, products, and services is a key component of achieving global sustainable development goals⁸. We know that there is both a need and a demand for dual contraceptive use (i.e., for both partners to use a form of contraception)⁹¹⁰. We know that women would trust their partners to use a form of contraception¹¹. We know that men are actively seeking better alternatives to their limited contraceptive options¹²¹³¹⁴¹⁵¹⁶¹⁷. And we know that there is promising research being done in the field¹⁸¹⁹ to address the lack of male birth control options both with respect to non-hormonal²⁰²¹²²²³²⁴²⁵²⁶²⁷²⁸²⁹³⁰³¹³² and hormonal options³³³⁴³⁵³⁶³⁷. So what should we do to change this? A critical first step that must be taken is to engage with and listen to men in order to give proper attention and weight to their unmet needs with respect to contraceptives³⁸³⁹. We then have to reframe how we define “risk” with respect to unintended pregnancies so that it is expanded beyond the direct physical risk and take into consideration the impact on men⁴⁰⁴¹. We also need to more completely link male and female contraceptive methods and appreciate that women will benefit from male birth control methods just as men benefit from female ones⁴²⁴³. Further, we must also ensure contraception is linked beyond sexuality and reproductive freedom and weight is given to its systemic implications vis-a-vis global challenges⁴⁴⁴⁵⁴⁶ and sustainability aspirations⁴⁷. And as the field of non-binary sexual health continues to expand, we must also expand our thinking around the contraceptive needs of all users/beneficiaries/people⁴⁸⁴⁹⁵⁰⁵¹⁵²⁵³. So how do we proceed? Ensuring people have access to safe, effective, modern forms of contraception will require a recommitment from nations to meeting their citizenry’s family planning needs and goals, with an associated increase in capital investment⁵⁴. This needs to be coupled with focused demand generation activities in order to catalyze interest in populations that may not currently be aware of the impact that modern contraceptives can have on improving their lives⁵⁵ as well as considerable efforts to improve access to and distribution of contraceptives⁵⁶⁵⁷⁵⁸⁵⁹. We also must shift away from the traditional approaches of drug research and development activities to foster collaboration through different problem-solving methodologies to offset the limited financial support for the field and in an effort to accelerate the product development timelines⁶⁰⁶¹⁶². Furthermore, in order to engage with society at large more effectively and ensure that people have the base knowledge necessary to understand and appreciate the importance of contraception, we need to improve our educational efforts with regards to sex and reproductive biology⁶³⁶⁴⁶⁵. There is a clear need for us to move beyond the currently available birth control methods for men⁶⁶ since, despite the challenges inherent to contraception⁶⁷ generally, increasing the number of methods for men and getting men to engage with family planning objectives more meaningfully⁶⁸ will be necessary to reduce instances of unintended pregnancies⁶⁹. Moreover, engaging men in reproductive health has the opportunity to increase the overall health of a demographic that seeks preventative care less frequently than other groups⁷⁰⁷¹⁷²⁷³. Male contraception has had an intriguing past⁷⁴, is currently experiencing an exciting present⁷⁵, and is on track towards an optimistic future⁷⁶. Contraceptive methods targeting sperm producers should be front and center in helping people achieve reproductive autonomy⁷⁷ and be the catalyst for the next contraception revolution⁷⁸. ¹ Anderson DJ. Population and the Environment - Time for Another Contraception Revolution. N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381(5):397-399. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1906733. PMID: 31365795.
² Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Alkema L, Sedgh G. Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Apr;6(4):e380-e389. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30029-9. Epub 2018 Mar 5. PMID: 29519649; PMCID: PMC6055480. ³ Parks, C., & Peipert, J. F. (2016). Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 214(6), 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.017 ⁴ Downey, D. B. (1995). When bigger is not better: Family size, parental resources, and children's educational performance. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 746–761. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096320 ⁵ Bailey MJ, Malkova O, Norling J. DO FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS DECREASE POVERTY? EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC CENSUS DATA. CESifo Econ Stud. 2014;60(2):312-337. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifu011 ⁶ Hammond, Alexandra, "Disparities in Access to Contraception in the United States: an Intersectional Analysis" (2019). Scripps Senior Theses. 1356. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1356 ⁷ Kantorová V, Wheldon MC, Ueffing P, Dasgupta ANZ. Estimating progress towards meeting women's contraceptive needs in 185 countries: A Bayesian hierarchical modelling study. PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 18;17(2):e1003026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003026. PMID: 32069289; PMCID: PMC7028249. ⁸ Starbird E, Norton M, Marcus R. Investing in Family Planning: Key to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(2):191-210. Published 2016 Jun 27. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00374 ⁹ Woodsong C, Koo HP. Two good reasons: women's and men's perspectives on dual contraceptive use. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):567-580. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00060-x ¹⁰ Ross, J., & Hardee, K. (2017). USE OF MALE METHODS OF CONTRACEPTION WORLDWIDE. Journal of Biosocial Science, 49(5), 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932016000560 ¹¹ A.F. Glasier, R. Anakwe, D. Everington, C.W. Martin, Z.van der Spuy, L. Cheng, P.C. Ho, R.A. Anderson, Would women trust their partners to use a male pill?, Human Reproduction, Volume 15, Issue 3, March 2000, Pages 646–649, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.3.646 ¹² Dorman E, Bishai D. Demand for male contraception. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Oct;12(5):605-13. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.52. PMID: 23186401. ¹³ Interest Among U.S. Men for New Male Contraceptive Options: Consumer Research Study. https://www.malecontraceptive.org/uploads/1/3/1/9/131958006/mci_consumerresearchstudy.pdf ¹⁴ Weston, G. C., Schlipalius, M. L., Bhuinneain, M. N., & Vollenhoven, B. J. (2002). Will Australian men use male hormonal contraception? A survey of a postpartum population. The Medical Journal of Australia, 176(5), 208–210. ¹⁵ Sundaram, A., Vaughan, B., Kost, K., Bankole, A., Finer, L., Singh, S., & Trussell, J. (2017). Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth: contraceptive failure rates in the U.S. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12017 ¹⁶ Cartwright, A. F., Lawton, A., Brunie, A., & Callahan, R. L. (2020). What About Methods for Men? A Qualitative Analysis of Attitudes Toward Male Contraception in Burkina Faso and Uganda. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e9720 ¹⁷ Glasier, A. (2010). Acceptability of contraception for men: A review. Contraception, 82(5), 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2010.03.016 ¹⁸ Long, J. E., Lee, M. S., & Blithe, D. L. (2019). Male Contraceptive Development: Update on Novel Hormonal and Nonhormonal Methods. Clinical Chemistry, 65(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2018.295089 ¹⁹ Khourdaji, I., Zillioux, J., Eisenfrats, K., Foley, D., & Smith, R. (2018). The future of male contraception: A fertile ground. Translational Andrology and Urology, 7(Suppl 2), S220–S235. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.03.23 ²⁰ Syeda SS, Sánchez G, McDermott JP, Hong KH, Blanco G, Georg GI. The Na+ and K+ transport system of sperm (ATP1A4) is essential for male fertility and an attractive target for male contraception†. Biol Reprod. 2020 Aug 4;103(2):343-356. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaa093. PMID: 32588885; PMCID: PMC7401355. ²¹ Chang Z, Qin W, Zheng H, Schegg K, Han L, Liu X, Wang Y, Wang Z, McSwiggin H, Peng H, Yuan S, Wu J, Wang Y, Zhu S, Jiang Y, Nie H, Tang Y, Zhou Y, Hitchcock MJM, Tang Y, Yan W. Triptonide is a reversible non-hormonal male contraceptive agent in mice and non-human primates. Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 23;12(1):1253. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21517-5. PMID: 33623031; PMCID: PMC7902613. ²² Chauhan A, Thaper D, Prabha V. Sperm impairing microbial factor: potential candidate for male contraception. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Sep 30;18(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00654-4. PMID: 32998760; PMCID: PMC7526221. ²³ Lishko PV. Contraception: Search for an Ideal Unisex Mechanism by Targeting Ion Channels. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016 Oct;41(10):816-818. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 18. PMID: 27545067; PMCID: PMC5364274. ²⁴ Amory JK. Male contraception. Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1303-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.036. Epub 2016 Sep 24. PMID: 27678037; PMCID: PMC5159259. ²⁵ Colagross-Schouten, A., Lemoy, M.-J., Keesler, R. I., Lissner, E., & VandeVoort, C. A. (2017). The contraceptive efficacy of intravas injection of VasalgelTM for adult male rhesus monkeys. Basic and Clinical Andrology, 27(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-017-0048-9 ²⁶ Crapster, J. A., Rack, P. G., Hellmann, Z. J., Le, A. D., Adams, C. M., Leib, R. D., Elias, J. E., Perrino, J., Behr, B., Li, Y., Lin, J., Zeng, H., & Chen, J. K. (2020). HIPK4 is essential for murine spermiogenesis. ELife, 9, e50209. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50209 ²⁷ Salicioni, A. M., Gervasi, M. G., Sosnik, J., Tourzani, D. A., Nayyab, S., Caraballo, D. A., & Visconti, P. E. (2020). Testis-specific serine kinase protein family in male fertility and as targets for non-hormonal male contraception†. Biology of Reproduction, 103(2), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioaa064 ²⁸ Khilwani, B., Badar, A., Ansari, A. S., & Lohiya, N. K. (2020). RISUG® as a male contraceptive: Journey from bench to bedside. Basic and Clinical Andrology, 30, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-020-0099-1 ²⁹ O’Rand, M. G., Hamil, K. G., Adevai, T., & Zelinski, M. (2018). Inhibition of sperm motility in male macaques with EP055, a potential non-hormonal male contraceptive. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0195953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195953 ³⁰ White, C. W., Choong, Y.-T., Short, J. L., Exintaris, B., Malone, D. T., Allen, A. M., Evans, R. J., & Ventura, S. (2013). Male contraception via simultaneous knockout of α1A-adrenoceptors and P2X1-purinoceptors in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(51), 20825–20830. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318624110 ³¹ Yu, Z., Ku, A. F., Anglin, J. L., Sharma, R., Ucisik, M. N., Faver, J. C., Li, F., Nyshadham, P., Simmons, N., Sharma, K. L., Nagarajan, S., Riehle, K., Kaur, G., Sankaran, B., Storl-Desmond, M., Palmer, S. S., Young, D. W., Kim, C., & Matzuk, M. M. (2021). Discovery and characterization of bromodomain 2–specific inhibitors of BRDT. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2021102118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021102118 ³² Weigel Muñoz, M., Carvajal, G., Curci, L., Gonzalez, S. N., & Cuasnicu, P. S. (2019). Relevance of CRISP proteins for epididymal physiology, fertilization, and fertility. Andrology, 7(5), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12638 ³³ Piotrowska K, Wang C, Swerdloff RS, Liu PY. Male hormonal contraception: hope and promise. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Mar;5(3):214-223. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00034-6. Epub 2016 Feb 23. PMID: 26915313; PMCID: PMC4993687. ³⁴ Thirumalai A, Page ST. Male Hormonal Contraception. Annu Rev Med. 2020 Jan 27;71:17-31. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042418-010947. Epub 2019 Sep 19. PMID: 31537185. ³⁵ Nguyen BT, Farrant MT, Anawalt BD, Yuen F, Thirumalai A, Amory JK, Swerdloff RS, Bremner WJ, Liu PY, Blithe DL, Page ST, Wang C. Acceptability of oral dimethandrolone undecanoate in a 28-day placebo-controlled trial of a hormonal male contraceptive prototype. Contraception. 2020 Jul;102(1):52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 13. PMID: 32298717; PMCID: PMC7287214. ³⁶ Yuen F, Nguyen BT, Swerdloff RS, Wang C. Continuing the search for a hormonal male contraceptive. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;66:83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 19. PMID: 32197832; PMCID: PMC7375909. ³⁷ Roth, M. Y., Shih, G., Ilani, N., Wang, C., Page, S. T., Bremner, W. J., Swerdloff, R. S., Sitruk-Ware, R., Blithe, D. L., & Amory, J. K. (2014). Acceptability of a transdermal gel-based male hormonal contraceptive in a randomized controlled trial. Contraception, 90(4), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.013 ³⁸ Hook C, Hardee K, Shand T, Jordan S, Greene ME. A long way to go: engagement of men and boys in country family planning commitments and implementation plans. Gates Open Res. 2021 May 21;5:85. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13230.1. PMID: 34136752; PMCID: PMC8187813. ³⁹ Marcell AV, Gibbs SE, Choiriyyah I, Sonenstein FL, Astone NM, Pleck JH, Dariotis JK. National Needs of Family Planning Among US Men Aged 15 to 44 Years. Am J Public Health. 2016 Apr;106(4):733-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303037. Epub 2016 Feb 18. PMID: 26890180; PMCID: PMC4815999. ⁴⁰ Lindberg, L. D., & Kost, K. (2014). Exploring U.S. men’s birth intentions. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(3), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1286-x ⁴¹ Campelia GD, Abbe C, Nickels LM, McElmeel E, Amory JK. "Shared risk": Reframing risk analysis in the ethics of novel male contraceptives. Contraception. 2020 Aug;102(2):67-69. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 May 29. PMID: 32474061; PMCID: PMC8168714. ⁴² “The Social and Economic Benefits of Women’s Ability To Determine Whether and When to Have Children” by Adam Sonfield, Kinsey Hasstedt, Megan L. Kavanaugh, and Ragnar Anderson https://www.guttmacher.org/report/social-and-economic-benefits-womens-ability-determine-whether-and-when-have-children ⁴³ Campo-Engelstein, L. (2012). Contraceptive Justice: Why We Need a Male Pill. AMA Journal of Ethics, 14(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.2.msoc1-1202 ⁴⁴ Yazdkhasti M, Pourreza A, Pirak A, Abdi F. Unintended Pregnancy and Its Adverse Social and Economic Consequences on Health System: A Narrative Review Article. Iran J Public Health. 2015 Jan;44(1):12-21. PMID: 26060771; PMCID: PMC4449999. ⁴⁵ Stephenson J, Newman K, Mayhew S. Population dynamics and climate change: what are the links? J Public Health (Oxf). 2010 Jun;32(2):150-6. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq038. PMID: 20501867. ⁴⁶ Adedze M, Osei-Yeboah R. Underuse of modern contraception in sub-Saharan Africa: are there implications for sustainable development and climate change? A review of the literature. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Aug;24(4):314-318. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1618448. Epub 2019 Jun 5. PMID: 31165645. ⁴⁷ Starbird E, Norton M, Marcus R. Investing in Family Planning: Key to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(2):191-210. Published 2016 Jun 27. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00374 ⁴⁸ Gomez AM, Đỗ L, Ratliff GA, Crego PI, Hastings J. Contraceptive Beliefs, Needs, and Care Experiences Among Transgender and Nonbinary Young Adults. J Adolesc Health. 2020 Oct;67(4):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Jun 9. PMID: 32527572. ⁴⁹ Boudreau D, Mukerjee R. Contraception Care for Transmasculine Individuals on Testosterone Therapy. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Jul;64(4):395-402. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12962. Epub 2019 Apr 18. PMID: 30997955. ⁵⁰ Nisly NL, Imborek KL, Miller ML, Kaliszewski SD, Williams RM, Krasowski MD. Unique Primary Care Needs of Transgender and Gender Non-Binary People. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;61(4):674-686. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000404. PMID: 30339607. ⁵¹ Mancini I, Alvisi S, Gava G, Seracchioli R, Meriggiola MC. Contraception across transgender. Int J Impot Res. 2021 Feb 8. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00412-z. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33558672. ⁵² Light A, Wang LF, Zeymo A, Gomez-Lobo V. Family planning and contraception use in transgender men. Contraception. 2018 Oct;98(4):266-269. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 23. PMID: 29944875. ⁵³ Krempasky C, Harris M, Abern L, Grimstad F. Contraception across the transmasculine spectrum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.043. Epub 2019 Aug 5. PMID: 31394072. ⁵⁴ Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006 Nov 18;368(9549):1810-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69480-4. PMID: 17113431. ⁵⁵ Belaid L, Dumont A, Chaillet N, Zertal A, De Brouwere V, Hounton S, Ridde V. Effectiveness of demand generation interventions on use of modern contraceptives in low- and middle-income countries. Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Oct;21(10):1240-1254. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12758. Epub 2016 Aug 17. PMID: 27465589. ⁵⁶ Killion MM. Improving Access to Hormonal Contraception Methods. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2020 Mar/Apr;45(2):124. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000600. PMID: 32097224. ⁵⁷ Chescheir NC. Worldwide Abortion Rates and Access to Contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):783-785. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002028. PMID: 28426596. ⁵⁸ Dawson A, Tran NT, Westley E, Mangiaterra V, Festin M. Improving access to emergency contraception pills through strengthening service delivery and demand generation: a systematic review of current evidence in low and middle-income countries. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 6;9(10):e109315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109315. PMID: 25285438; PMCID: PMC4186851. ⁵⁹ Mukasa B, Ali M, Farron M, Van de Weerdt R. Contraception supply chain challenges: a review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017 Oct;22(5):384-390. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1394453. Epub 2017 Oct 31. PMID: 29087737. ⁶⁰ Heather L Vahdat, Kevin Shane, Logan M Nickels, The role of team science in the future of male contraception, Biology of Reproduction, Volume 103, Issue 2, August 2020, Pages 167–175, https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioaa086 ⁶¹ Johnston, D. S., & Goldberg, E. (2020). Preclinical contraceptive development for men and women. Biology of Reproduction, 103(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioaa076 ⁶² Balbach, M., Fushimi, M., Huggins, D. J., Steegborn, C., Meinke, P. T., Levin, L. R., & Buck, J. (2020). Optimization of lead compounds into on-demand, nonhormonal contraceptives: Leveraging a public–private drug discovery institute collaboration†. Biology of Reproduction, ioaa052. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioaa052 ⁶³ Hall KS, McDermott Sales J, Komro KA, Santelli J. The State of Sex Education in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jun;58(6):595-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.032. PMID: 27210007; PMCID: PMC5426905. ⁶⁴ Pound P. How should mandatory sex education be taught? BMJ. 2017 Apr 11;357:j1768. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1768. PMID: 28400378. ⁶⁵ Kirby D, Obasi A, Laris BA. The effectiveness of sex education and HIV education interventions in schools in developing countries. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2006;938:103-50; discussion 317-41. PMID: 16921919. ⁶⁶ Roth MY, Amory JK. Beyond the Condom: Frontiers in Male Contraception. Semin Reprod Med. 2016 May;34(3):183-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571435. Epub 2016 Mar 4. PMID: 26947703; PMCID: PMC5107581. ⁶⁷ Binette A, Howatt K, Waddington A, Reid RL. Ten Challenges in Contraception. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jan;26(1):44-49. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5854. Epub 2016 Aug 22. PMID: 27548360. ⁶⁸ Bustamante-Forest R, Giarratano G. Changing men's involvement in reproductive health and family planning. Nurs Clin North Am. 2004 Jun;39(2):301-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2004.02.001. PMID: 15159181. ⁶⁹ Abbe CR, Page ST, Thirumalai A. Male Contraception. Yale J Biol Med. 2020 Sep 30;93(4):603-613. PMID: 33005125; PMCID: PMC7513428. ⁷⁰ Almeling, R. (2020). Guynecology: The missing science of men’s reproductive health. University of California Press. ⁷¹ Hardee, K., Croce-Galis, M., & Gay, J. (2017). Are men well served by family planning programs? Reproductive Health, 14(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0278-5 ⁷² Schlichthorst, M., Sanci, L. A., Pirkis, J., Spittal, M. J., & Hocking, J. S. (2016). Why do men go to the doctor? Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors associated with healthcare utilisation among a cohort of Australian men. BMC Public Health, 16(Suppl 3), 1028. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3706-5 ⁷³ Kotelchuck, M., & Lu, M. (2017). Father’s Role in Preconception Health. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21(11), 2025–2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2370-4 ⁷⁴ Diller L, Hembree W. Male contraception and family planning: a social and historical review. Fertil Steril. 1977 Dec;28(12):1271-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)42968-7. PMID: 338367. ⁷⁵ Thirumalai A, Page ST. Recent Developments in Male Contraception. Drugs. 2019 Jan;79(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1038-8. PMID: 30588563. ⁷⁶ Payne C, Goldberg E. Male contraception: past, present and future. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2014;7(2):175-81. doi: 10.2174/1874467208666150206105636. PMID: 25658225. ⁷⁷ Chadwick R. Reproductive autonomy and responsibility: current trends. Bioethics. 2018 Jan;32(1):2. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12422. PMID: 29266339. ⁷⁸ Anderson DJ. Population and the Environment - Time for Another Contraception Revolution. N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381(5):397-399. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1906733. PMID: 31365795. Comments are closed.
|
Categories
All
Archives
October 2024
|